(Part 2 of 2)Detailed Analysis of Inaccuracies in the (Anti-Avestan) Book of Esther

1. Characterization of King Ahasuerus (Xerxes I)

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:10-12
    • Text: “On the seventh day, when the heart of the king was merry with wine, he commanded Mehuman, Biztha, Harbona, Bigtha, Abagtha, Zethar, and Carcas, the seven chamberlains that served in the presence of Ahasuerus the king, to bring Vashti the queen before the king with the crown royal, to show the people and the princes her beauty: for she was fair to look on. But the queen Vashti refused to come at the king’s commandment by his chamberlains: therefore was the king very wroth, and his anger burned in him.”
    • Inaccuracy: This scene portrays King Xerxes as easily swayed by alcohol and angered by Vashti’s refusal. Historically, Xerxes I was known for his strategic and authoritative rule, not for making impulsive decisions under the influence of wine.

2. Portrayal of Haman and Persian Officials

  • Verse Reference: Esther 3:6
    • Text: “And he thought scorn to lay hands on Mordecai alone; for they had shewed him the people of Mordecai: wherefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jews that were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus, even the people of Mordecai.”
    • Inaccuracy: Haman’s plot to annihilate all Jews is depicted as a result of personal animosity. This portrayal lacks historical basis, as Persian officials were governed by complex legal and ethical codes influenced by Zoroastrianism, which emphasized justice and the welfare of all subjects.

3. Legal and Ethical Systems

  • Verse Reference: Esther 3:13
    • Text: “And the letters were sent by posts into all the king’s provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to cause to perish, all Jews, both young and old, little children and women, in one day, even upon the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, which is the month Adar, and to take the spoil of them for a prey.”
    • Inaccuracy: The narrative of a single, arbitrary decree to exterminate an entire people contradicts the structured legal systems of the Achaemenid Empire. Persian law, influenced by Zoroastrianism, was known for its fairness and judicial processes that protected the rights of all citizens.

4. Religious Context and Zoroastrian Beliefs

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:13-15
    • Text: “Then the king said to the wise men, which knew the times, (for so was the king’s manner toward all that knew law and judgment: And the next unto him was Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, the seven princes of Persia and Media, which saw the king’s face, and which sat the first in the kingdom;) What shall we do unto the queen Vashti according to law, because she hath not performed the commandment of the king Ahasuerus by the chamberlains?”
    • Inaccuracy: The text’s portrayal of Persian officials and their legal deliberations may seem historically plausible, but it lacks recognition of the Zoroastrian principles that influenced their decisions. The Zoroastrian faith emphasized truth, justice, and the moral conduct of rulers, which is not reflected in the narrative’s depiction of arbitrary justice.

5. Court Life and Values

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:6
    • Text: “Where were white, green, and blue, hangings, fastened with cords of fine linen and purple to silver rings and pillars of marble: the beds were of gold and silver, upon a pavement of red, and blue, and white, and black, marble.”
    • Inaccuracy: The description of the Persian court’s decadence is exaggerated. While the Persian Empire was indeed wealthy and lavish, it also had a highly organized and ethical administrative system, which is often overlooked in this narrative.

6. Depiction of Persian Festivities and Excesses

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:5-8
    • Text: “And when these days were expired, the king made a feast unto all the people that were present in Shushan the palace, both unto great and small, seven days, in the court of the garden of the king’s palace; where were white, green, and blue, hangings, fastened with cords of fine linen and purple to silver rings and pillars of marble: the beds were of gold and silver, upon a pavement of red, and blue, and white, and black, marble. And they gave them drink in vessels of gold, (the vessels being diverse one from another,) and royal wine in abundance, according to the state of the king. And the drinking was according to the law; none did compel: for so the king had appointed to all the officers of his house, that they should do according to every man’s pleasure.”
    • Inaccuracy: The depiction of excessive feasting and indulgence can be seen as a stereotypical portrayal of decadence in the Persian court. While Persian rulers did host grand events, the narrative emphasizes excess to a degree that overshadows the administrative and ethical dimensions of Persian governance, which were significantly influenced by Zoroastrian values of moderation, justice, and order.

7. Haman’s Edict and the Legal System

  • Verse Reference: Esther 3:9-11
    • Text: “If it please the king, let it be written that they may be destroyed: and I will pay ten thousand talents of silver to the hands of those that have the charge of the business, to bring it into the king’s treasuries. And the king took his ring from his hand, and gave it unto Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, the Jews’ enemy. And the king said unto Haman, The silver is given to thee, the people also, to do with them as it seemeth good to thee.”
    • Inaccuracy: The ease with which Haman secures the king’s approval for a decree to annihilate an entire people undermines the complexity and procedural nature of the Persian legal system. Historically, Persian law, influenced by Zoroastrian principles, required thorough deliberation and was designed to protect the rights of all subjects, regardless of their background.

8. Mordecai’s Rise to Power

  • Verse Reference: Esther 8:2
    • Text: “And the king took off his ring, which he had taken from Haman, and gave it unto Mordecai. And Esther set Mordecai over the house of Haman.”
    • Inaccuracy: Mordecai’s sudden rise to a position of immense power immediately after Haman’s downfall may not align with the historical practices of the Persian court, where positions of power were often awarded based on extensive experience and loyalty proven over time. Such swift transitions could disrupt the continuity and stability valued in Persian administration.

9. Queen Esther’s Influence

  • Verse Reference: Esther 4:11
    • Text: “All the king’s servants, and the people of the king’s provinces, do know, that whosoever, whether man or woman, shall come unto the king into the inner court, who is not called, there is one law of his to put him to death, except such to whom the king shall hold out the golden sceptre, that he may live: but I have not been called to come in unto the king these thirty days.”
    • Inaccuracy: The portrayal of the king’s court as a place where even the queen risks death by approaching the king without being summoned may exaggerate the harshness of court protocols. Historically, Persian queens often held significant influence and had more direct access to the king, reflecting the important role of royal women in court affairs.

10. Mass Retribution Against Enemies

  • Verse Reference: Esther 9:5-10
    • Text: “Thus the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword, and slaughter, and destruction, and did what they would unto those that hated them. And in Shushan the palace the Jews slew and destroyed five hundred men. And Parshandatha, and Dalphon, and Aspatha, and Poratha, and Adalia, and Aridatha, and Parmashta, and Arisai, and Aridai, and Vajezatha, the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand.”
    • Inaccuracy: The narrative of widespread slaughter and retribution ordered by the Jews, while defending themselves, portrays a level of sanctioned violence that contrasts with the historical records of the Persian Empire’s emphasis on justice and order. The Persian administration valued the protection of its subjects and maintaining social harmony.

11. Esther’s Selection as Queen

  • Verse Reference: Esther 2:16-17
    • Text: “So Esther was taken unto king Ahasuerus into his house royal in the tenth month, which is the month Tebeth, in the seventh year of his reign. And the king loved Esther above all the women, and she obtained grace and favour in his sight more than all the virgins; so that he set the royal crown upon her head, and made her queen instead of Vashti.”
    • Inaccuracy: The process of selecting a queen through a beauty contest, as described, might oversimplify the actual practices of the Persian court. Historically, marriages and royal appointments often involved political alliances and considerations of noble lineage, reflecting a more complex social and political structure.

12. The Role of Women in the Persian Court

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:19-20
    • Text: “If it please the king, let there go a royal commandment from him, and let it be written among the laws of the Persians and the Medes, that it be not altered, That Vashti come no more before king Ahasuerus; and let the king give her royal estate unto another that is better than she. And when the king’s decree which he shall make shall be published throughout all his empire, (for it is great,) all the wives shall give to their husbands honour, both to great and small.”
    • Inaccuracy: The depiction of Queen Vashti’s banishment and the subsequent decree about women’s subservience might exaggerate gender dynamics. While Persian society was patriarchal, women, especially in the royal family, held significant influence and could own property, conduct business, and partake in court politics.

13. Esther’s Influence on Persian Policy

  • Verse Reference: Esther 8:3-6
    • Text: “And Esther spake yet again before the king, and fell down at his feet, and besought him with tears to put away the mischief of Haman the Agagite, and his device that he had devised against the Jews. Then the king held out the golden sceptre toward Esther. So Esther arose, and stood before the king, And said, If it please the king, and if I have found favour in his sight, and the thing seem right before the king, and I be pleasing in his eyes, let it be written to reverse the letters devised by Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, which he wrote to destroy the Jews which are in all the king’s provinces.”
    • Inaccuracy: The portrayal of Esther’s influence on reversing Haman’s decree might not align with historical practices where royal decrees, once issued, were difficult to reverse due to the legal principle of the Medes and Persians that a law, once passed, could not be changed. However, the king could issue a new decree that countered the previous one, a complexity not fully explored in the narrative.

14. Administration of the Persian Empire

  • Verse Reference: Esther 3:12
    • Text: “Then were the king’s scribes called on the thirteenth day of the first month, and there was written according to all that Haman had commanded unto the king’s lieutenants, and to the governors that were over every province, and to the rulers of every people of every province according to the writing thereof, and to every people after their language; in the name of king Ahasuerus was it written, and sealed with the king’s ring.”
    • Inaccuracy: The rapid execution of Haman’s decree suggests an overly simplistic and swift administrative process. In reality, the Persian Empire’s bureaucracy was extensive and complex, with a well-developed system for communication and governance that involved thorough checks and deliberations.

15. Persian Religious Tolerance

  • Verse Reference: Esther 4:14
    • Text: “For if thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time, then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place; but thou and thy father’s house shall be destroyed: and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?”
    • Inaccuracy: The narrative implies that Jews were particularly vulnerable to annihilation due to their faith. Historically, the Persian Empire was known for its relative religious tolerance and protection of various religious communities, including Jews, under Cyrus the Great’s decree allowing exiled peoples to return to their homelands and rebuild their temples.

16. Representation of Persian Customs and Laws

  • Verse Reference: Esther 1:19
    • Text: “If it please the king, let there go a royal commandment from him, and let it be written among the laws of the Persians and the Medes, that it be not altered, That Vashti come no more before king Ahasuerus; and let the king give her royal estate unto another that is better than she.”
    • Inaccuracy: The irrevocability of Persian laws is emphasized here, suggesting an overly rigid legal system. While it is true that Persian laws were difficult to alter, the narrative does not fully capture the procedural complexities and administrative deliberations that would typically accompany such significant decisions.

17. Depiction of Mordecai’s Rise

  • Verse Reference: Esther 6:10-11
    • Text: “Then the king said to Haman, Make haste, and take the apparel and the horse, as thou hast said, and do even so to Mordecai the Jew, that sitteth at the king’s gate: let nothing fail of all that thou hast spoken. Then took Haman the apparel and the horse, and arrayed Mordecai, and brought him on horseback through the street of the city, and proclaimed before him, Thus shall it be done unto the man whom the king delighteth to honour.”
    • Inaccuracy: The sudden elevation of Mordecai from a lowly position to one of honor might oversimplify the courtly protocols and merit-based advancements typical in the Persian administration. Historical accounts suggest that positions of honor and responsibility were usually earned through a long record of service and loyalty.

18. Handling of the Aftermath

  • Verse Reference: Esther 9:12-14
    • Text: “And the king said unto Esther the queen, The Jews have slain and destroyed five hundred men in Shushan the palace, and the ten sons of Haman; what have they done in the rest of the king’s provinces? now what is thy petition? and it shall be granted thee: or what is thy request further? and it shall be done. Then said Esther, If it please the king, let it be granted to the Jews which are in Shushan to do to morrow also according unto this day’s decree, and let Haman’s ten sons be hanged upon the gallows.”
    • Inaccuracy: The ease with which Esther secures the king’s approval for continued violence and the execution of Haman’s sons portrays a simplistic view of royal decrees and justice. The Achaemenid Empire had a more structured approach to governance and legal matters, influenced by Zoroastrian ethics of justice and righteousness.

19. Jewish Self-Defense and Retaliation

  • Verse Reference: Esther 9:16
    • Text: “But the other Jews that were in the king’s provinces gathered themselves together, and stood for their lives, and had rest from their enemies, and slew of their foes seventy and five thousand, but they laid not their hands on the prey.”
    • Inaccuracy: The large-scale retaliation described here might exaggerate the historical realities of Jewish self-defense in the Persian Empire. While defensive actions were plausible, the numbers and scale of the conflict could be seen as an embellishment, given the Persian Empire’s emphasis on maintaining order and protecting minority communities.

20. Purim and Historical Context

  • Verse Reference: Esther 9:20-22
    • Text: “And Mordecai wrote these things, and sent letters unto all the Jews that were in all the provinces of the king Ahasuerus, both nigh and far, To stablish this among them, that they should keep the fourteenth day of the month Adar, and the fifteenth day of the same, yearly, As the days wherein the Jews rested from their enemies, and the month which was turned unto them from sorrow to joy, and from mourning into a good day: that they should make them days of feasting and joy, and of sending portions one to another, and gifts to the poor.”
    • Inaccuracy: The establishment of Purim as a festival might be portrayed as an immediate and widespread institution. Historically, the recognition and institutionalization of new traditions typically evolved over time and were influenced by broader cultural and administrative acceptance within the empire.

Addressing Misrepresentations

1. Educational Initiatives

  • Promote Accurate Historical Context: Highlight the contributions of the Persian Empire and Zoroastrianism to world history, emphasizing their sophisticated legal systems, ethical codes, and cultural achievements.
  • Correct Misrepresentations: Encourage scholarly work that critically examines the Book of Esther’s historical inaccuracies and promotes a balanced view.

2. Interfaith and Cultural Dialogue

  • Engage in Dialogue: Facilitate discussions that explore the story of Esther’s impact on cultural perceptions of the Persian Empire and Zoroastrianism. These discussions can foster mutual understanding and respect.
  • Respect Religious Narratives: While critiquing inaccuracies, it is important to acknowledge and respect the cultural and religious significance of the story of Esther within Judaism.

3. Media Representation

  • Advocate for Accuracy: Work with filmmakers, authors, and media creators to ensure that portrayals of Persian history and Zoroastrianism are accurate and respectful, avoiding stereotypes and historical inaccuracies.

Conclusion

The story of Esther, while cherished in Jewish tradition, contains several inaccuracies regarding Persian history and Zoroastrian beliefs. By focusing on specific verses and addressing the historical and cultural misrepresentations, we can promote a more nuanced and respectful understanding of the Persian Empire and its rich heritage. Through education, dialogue, and media advocacy, we can work towards a future where all cultures and histories are portrayed with accuracy and respect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *